About

Korea Cycle Data tracks Korea's export, memory, and industrial cycles using public data.

Every post is built from primary sources — Korean customs statistics, Bank of Korea data, company IR disclosures, and academic conference material. All charts are produced independently from that data.

Methodology

This site does not publish rumors, unnamed-source claims, or non-public information. Where a figure is an estimate or an illustrative calculation, it is labeled as such.

Figures are dated and attributed. Where sources disagree, the disagreement is shown rather than resolved silently.

Contact

kwkimbest@gmail.com

Nothing on this site is investment advice. All investment decisions are your own responsibility. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Nvidia's Inference GPU Skips HBM for GDDR7

Image
  "More inference means more HBM demand" is a common shorthand. Nvidia's own inference-only GPU says otherwise: Rubin CPX, unveiled September 9, 2025, carries no HBM at all. It runs on 128GB of GDDR7 — the same memory family used in gaming graphics cards. KEY TAKEAWAYS 1. Rubin CPX, Nvidia's inference-specialized GPU announced Sep 9, 2025, uses 128GB of GDDR7 instead of HBM4. Shipments are planned for late 2026. 2. Its estimated memory bandwidth is roughly 2.1TB/s — about 1/10th of Rubin's 22TB/s HBM4 bandwidth. That's a design choice, not a shortfall: the workload it targets needs less memory bandwidth. 3. Nvidia splits inference into two stages — prefill and decode — and now builds separate chips for each. Prefill runs on Rubin CPX; decode runs on HBM4-equipped Rubin. Estimated memory bandwidth by chip. Rubin CPX figure is back-calculated from rack-level totals, not a disclosed per-chip spec. What Rubin CPX actually is Nvidia describes Rubin CPX as a new cla...
Read more

Korea's August Chip Exports Hit a Record $46.7B. Volume Moved Too

Image
  Korea's semiconductor exports reached $46.65 billion in August, up 209.0% from a year earlier and 13.8% above July, according to the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy's August trade report released September 1. It is a new all-time monthly high, taking out June's $44.81 billion after a one-month dip. The number everyone will quote is the 209%. The number I think matters more is the 13.8%, because contract prices for commodity memory rose only 1% to 4% in August. For the first time this cycle, volume and mix did most of the month-on-month work. KEY TAKEAWAYS 1. Chip exports hit a record $46.65 billion in August (+209.0% YoY, +13.8% MoM) and now make up 47.5% of all Korean exports, versus 25.9% a year ago. 2. August's month-on-month gain outran price. DDR4 8Gb contract prices rose 4.2%, DDR5 16Gb 3.3%, NAND 128Gb 1.4%. An implied volume/mix index (Jan = 100) moved from 96 in July to 105 in August. 3. The growth is memory, not logic. Memory chips were $40.94 billion...
Read more

DDR4 Costs More Than DDR5 — Unless You're Actually Buying It

Image
  You have probably seen the headline: legacy DDR4 now costs more than newer DDR5 . Then you open a price comparison site to actually buy a stick, and the tags are the other way round. DDR5 is far more expensive. Both numbers are real. They are just measuring different things , and the distance between them says something about how strange this memory market has become. KEY TAKEAWAYS 1. On July 1, 2026, spot quotes put a DDR4 16Gb die at $74.63 against $46.83 for DDR5 16Gb — DDR4 59% higher . 2. That same month, Korean retail averaged about $151 for a DDR4 16GB module and $244 for a DDR5 16GB module — DDR5 61% higher . 3. Different units (one die vs one module) and different markets (spot vs retail). The two figures cannot be converted into each other , and reporting that treats a "16Gb" quote as a module price is off by a factor of eight. Same month. Opposite conclusions. Two numbers, both true Start with the chip. On DRAMeXchange spot on July 1, 2026 , the DDR4 16Gb...
Read more